Minggu, 31 Desember 2017

It's Maine Shrimp Season, Without the Shrimp - New York Times

It's Maine Shrimp Season, Without the Shrimp - New York Times

“People from away don’t necessarily get Pandalus borealis,” Mr. Hayward said.

Even native Mainers can understand why; Northern shrimp aren’t easy. Erin French, the chef of the Lost Kitchen, in Freedom, grew up picking shrimp for her father at his diner, the Ridge Top Restaurant in nearby Knox. He’d make her sit at the table until every one was shelled. She hated it.

“I felt like it went on for days and everything smelled like shrimp, and you didn’t even want to eat them when you were done with it,” Ms. French said.

Then you cook them at your peril; they swiftly turn to mush. “It takes not more than one minute of cooking for peeled, raw shrimp,” Marjorie Standish wrote in her 1973 cookbook “Keep Cooking — the Maine Way.”

Glen Libby used to rush his catch from boat to pot to cook it live, like lobster. The simpler the better.

“A load of salt in the kettle,” said Craig Durant, who fishes in Cundy’s Harbor. “You go find a cold Pepsi, and then you pick until your fingers bleed.”

Photo
The harbor in Port Clyde. Scientists say the number of shrimp in the Gulf of Maine is declining because of warming waters they link to climate change. Credit Sarah Rice for The New York Times

For some, the shrimp still seem like scraps. “Too much bother,” said the food historian Sandy Oliver, who lives on Islesboro, an island in Penobscot Bay. “These little, tiny shrimp, with the heads cleaned off and popped out of their shell, what have you got? Not much.”

Shrimp season usually runs from December to April, when the seas are brutally cold and high, and a shrimper might have to break ice to get to the boat. In those months, shrimp, unlike lobster, can be caught fairly close to shore. And unlike the more restrictive scalloping or lobstering fisheries, shrimping is open to anyone willing to pay for a permit.

As a so-called shoulder fishery, shrimping — whether trawling with a net or setting traps — served multiple functions, including providing another income source for shrimpers who might spend the rest of the year chasing lobster, scallops, haddock and cod.

The catch was quick and clean; shrimp move in dense packs, handy for scooping. A fisherman stood a good chance of making his quota in a morning and heading back for the mooring. This eased the worries of wives waiting at home.

The catch also filled their pots and pans. The commercial shrimp fishery in New England sputtered into existence in fits and starts from 1927 to 1938, but fishermen had long been eating the shrimp they had caught in their nets while seeking other fish.

Photo
The cookbook that the Libby family published in 2009. Glen Libby bought $700 worth of them to sell to customers, but demand is scant, given the absence of Maine shrimp. “I have sold two,” he said. Credit Sarah Rice for The New York Times

There wasn’t a market for Gulf of Maine shrimp. As an aquatic biologist for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the environmentalist Rachel Carson noted even in 1943, when there were roughly 25 boats shrimping, that competition from South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico shrimp was hindering development of the Northern resource.

Home cooks were in all likelihood canning it — according to Don Lindgren, the owner of Rabelais (“Fine Books on Food and Drink,” as it calls itself) in Biddeford — and were using it in recipes. One of the earliest he has found was for “shrimps à la crème” in the 1906 book “Proved and Tested Cooking Receipts,” by the Ladies of the Universalist Society of Rockland.

But efforts were also underway to raise the profile of Maine shrimp. A cannery in Rockport began processing shrimp in 1942. And around that time, Everett F. Greaton, the executive secretary of Maine’s Development Commission and a booster of all things Maine, presided with the governor over a dinner that included “Maine apples stuffed with gulf of Maine shrimp.” Mr. Lindgren believes that was the first time Maine shrimp was granted such a place of honor.

The shrimping fleet grew steadily, except for a few years beginning in 1953 when the species disappeared; scientists pointed to a pulse of warm water in the Gulf of Maine. In 1969, the year of the biggest catch on record, 11,000 metric tons, there were 223 Maine vessels shrimping, and 42 from Massachusetts. The price at the dock was 13 cents a pound. (The average price in the last decade the fishery was open was 67 cents a pound.)

Prices like those indicate limited demand, but they also helped establish that proprietary feeling so many Mainers speak of. Maine shrimp belonged to the locals, and sold best in seaside shacks, deep-fried and piled up on a paper tray — with ketchup, tartar sauce or cocktail sauce on the side — or in a roll or a stew.

As recently as 10 years ago, shrimp was the stuff you could buy by the side of the road, from peddlers who parked their trucks along coastal roads. Gary Libby describes locals coming to the dock with empty buckets and filling them for $10 or less.

“One guy used to come down and he’d give us a loaf of homemade bread, and we’d give him a bucket of shrimp,” Mr. Libby said.

Shrimp were abundant — and loved, even by once-reluctant pickers. When Ms. French wrote her cookbook, “The Lost Kitchen: Recipes and a Good Life Found in Freedom, Maine,” she included recipes for shrimp stew and a shrimp roll. But by the time it came out last spring, the recipes might have needed an expiration date.

“Who would have known?” Ms. French said. “It happened so fast.”

She approves of the continued closing of the fishery. “Until we really know,” she said. “Because when it is gone, it’s gone.”

Follow NYT Food on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Pinterest. Get regular updates from NYT Cooking, with recipe suggestions, cooking tips and shopping advice.

Continue reading the main story

Tour Confidential: What the Tiger Woods-Chris Como split means and bold predictions for 2018 - Golf.com

Steven M. Sipple: Frost's comments suggest sorely needed style shift in program is on way - Lincoln Journal Star

Steven M. Sipple: Frost's comments suggest sorely needed style shift in program is on way - Lincoln Journal Star

Happy holidays to all.

Please allow me to overanalyze recent quotes from new Nebraska football coach Scott Frost and his staff. The quotes offer a glimpse into the staff's philosophies and tone they want to set for the program.

The program's culture and style under Frost is going to be much different than it was under the previous coaching staff and athletic director.

That is the hope, anyway.

1. "I think we have good pieces on the team in Lincoln, and I think they probably had more talent on the team last year than what the record (4-8, 3-6 Big Ten) indicates, so we're excited to get to work with the guys who already are on the campus in Lincoln."

That was Frost's response to the very first question he fielded from media last week regarding Nebraska's 2018 recruiting class. When a reporter asked for the coach's impressions of the class, Frost first expressed confidence in players already on campus before elaborating on incoming players.

Talk about refreshing.

I go back to former Nebraska athletic director Shawn Eichorst's comments two days before the Music City Bowl in late 2016. He said the key for Mike Riley's program going forward was talent acquisition. That was a prevailing media and fan narrative during most of Riley's tenure — that he inherited a deficient roster and needed ample time to improve overall talent level. To Riley's credit, he never pushed the narrative, but Eichorst did.

Common sense tells you it's dangerous for any program to allow a prominent part of its culture to be one that forever suggests the next batch of players will be the answer. The message Eichorst — who had far too heavy of a hand in Riley's program — sent to Nebraska players before the Music City Bowl essentially was, "You're not good enough, but we'll be much better in the future." I'm sure that inspired confidence throughout the roster.

On the other hand, Frost's immediate approach ("I think we already have good pieces on the team in Lincoln") is more in line with the thinking of a high-level competitor who's bound and determined to win now — or at least compete! — as opposed to an excuse-laden culture that tends to place too much emphasis on the future while the program routinely gets its teeth kicked in on fall Saturdays.

2. "This signing day gets over-hyped, and I'm never going to be the one that does the overhyping."

That was another of Frost's comments last week. He knows he's entering a market in which recruiting dominates the discussion throughout the offseason.

Some of the phenomenon — which began to take hold in the early 2000s with the advent of recruiting websites and star ratings — can be explained by the natural flow of things in our state. That is, there is an insatiable year-round thirst for Nebraska football news, a thirst that is more intense than it is in probably 90 percent of the nation's programs.

But in the offseason, access to current Husker players and coaches is severely limited. So, local media cling to recruiting as a way to maintain reader traffic. You see waves of updates on prospects. You see long and glowing stories about incoming recruits and sometimes even recruits who are merely considering becoming a Husker.

Bottom line, there are no limits to the amount of recruiting stories any publication can churn out. So we're going to keep churning them out for the next seven months. It's as predictable as Wisconsin beating Nebraska.

Frost likely will try to tamp down this part of the Nebraska fan/media culture — and I'm guessing he'll become turned off the way Bo Pelini did when the big wheel keeps spinning away.

Riley, bless his heart, embraced the culture with open arms. When it was time for the Friday Night Lights recruiting festival, he was in his element. He thrived. It's one of the main reasons local media is going to miss him greatly.

3. "You're not going to see our staff jumping around in the coaching staff room every time we get a NLI (national letter of intent). I just don't think that's honest."

That's reflective of what I mean by "tamp down."

Recruiting aside, Frost's overall approach is in many ways strong but understated, reflective of the state's culture.

4. "Our main job and our main goal on offense and defense is to really put stress on the opposing team. We feel like we can do that by playing fast — getting (foes) out of their comfort zone."

When new Nebraska offensive coordinator Troy Walters made that comment last week on "Sports Nightly," I flashed back to something Frost told me in March of 2016 as he discussed the challenges of calling plays effectively in his no-huddle offense.

"I think sometimes people think I have a short attention span because in a long conversation, I've kind of already thought the whole thing out sometimes," Frost said. "I get distracted and get ahead too far. It's unique. When you get used to dealing with things that move as rapidly as we have to deal with on offense, sometimes a slow pace can irritate you a bit."

Frost will call the plays for Nebraska, as he did as UCF's head coach. He will expect players to be dialed-in daily — they'll have no choice if they want to play in his system.

5. "Trust me, I want to keep yards down as much as the next guy. But sometimes when you play more plays (per game), you play (the equivalent of) three or four extra games than everybody else in the country and yards aren't as manageable as you'd like them to be."

New defensive coordinator Erik Chinander recently sent out what sounded like words of caution. Will Nebraska fans fully understand that Frost's up-tempo offense sometimes puts stress on his own defense?

Fans obviously will be forgiving if wins pile up. It would also help if the Blackshirts minimize explosive plays and create turnovers — something Chinander's units at UCF have done quite well.

6. "One of the secrets of success at Nebraska for a long time was (coaching-staff) continuity, and people who understood the system and the scheme and where they fit and what their role was."

Frost is bringing back defining elements (i.e., bolstering the walk-on program) of former Nebraska head coach Tom Osborne's national-championship programs from the mid-1990s. But Frost is his own man. He'll do things his way, and his coaching record suggests he will produce a significantly tougher and better-prepared team than the one Husker fans watched in 2017.

That seems a safe bet. 

It can't get much worse than 2017.



Shale Growth Hides Underlying Problems - OilPrice.com

Shale Growth Hides Underlying Problems - OilPrice.com

All eyes are on U.S. shale as we head into 2018, with a growing number of analysts worrying that shale will spoil the oil price rally. Estimates of supply growth varying quite a bit, but directionally, everyone is in agreement: Supply is set to surge.

However, there are some cracks in the shale complex that might not necessarily mean much in the short-term, but raises some questions about the long-term durability of shale output. According to Rystad Energy, there is empirical evidence that points to falling production in the Eagle Ford from some of the recently drilled shale wells.

Everyone knows that shale wells enjoy an initial burst of output that is quickly followed by a precipitous decline within a few months. A driller must constantly drill new wells in order to grow production.

The shale industry has boasted of higher initial production rates from their shale wells over the last few years, which is seemingly evidence of improved drilling techniques, such as longer laterals, the increased use of frac sand and fluids, etc. In short, the shale industry has been able to coax more oil and gas out of a shale well in the first few months of a well coming online than it used to.

However, Rystad Energy argues that there is some evidence that suggests those higher initial production (IP) rates do not necessarily translate into larger gains in the total volume of oil and gas that is ultimately recovered. A sample of wells in the Eagle Ford showed steadily higher IPs in recent years, but they also exhibited steeper and steeper decline rates.

Related: Blockchain And The $3.6 Trillion Infrastructure Crisis

Part of the reason is that the shale industry has had to drill more wells that are closer together. That has typically been described as an innovation that leads to more recovery. Indeed, the initial production rates from the average well in several counties in South Texas have increased markedly year after year.

The first few horizontal wells in a section are classified as “parent” wells, with follow-up completions described as “infill” wells. In the Eagle Ford, according to Rystad Energy, the makeup of spudded wells has shifted dramatically towards infill wells as many areas of the basin have been worked over. In 2010, Rystad says, “up to 90 percent of activity corresponded to new pad development. This share declined rapidly over time, falling to 15-20 percent in 2015-2017.” As such, the rebound in output from the Eagle Ford over the past year has mostly come from infill drilling.

(Click to enlarge)

Rystad looked at two counties in particular – Karnes and De Witt – where infill drilling was especially dominant. In these two counties, the IP rates increased sharply between 2011 and 2016. In 2011, the IP for a new well in De Witt County peaked at about 500 barrels per day (bpd), a figure that nearly doubled to 900 bpd by 2016. Based on that, it appears that the shale industry has become dramatically more efficient, and it suggests that if such breakthroughs can be replicated, U.S. oil production can continue to climb.

But the huge gains fizzled after the first few months. Rystad concludes that when taking into account the first full year of production, not just the first month or two, the 2016 wells only resulted in an additional 40,000 barrels of oil compared to the 2011 wells. By the second year of production, the newer wells do not outperform the older ones at all. In other words, the 2016 wells had a stronger burst of output right away, but that was offset by steeper declines as the year wore on. “By any means, this cannot be classified as a significant uplift for the well ultimate recovery when considering a 100 percent increase in the peak production rate,” Rystad concludes.

(Click to enlarge)

Rystad even looked at a specific lease held by Marathon Oil. The first well drilled in 2012 had a peak IP rate of 35,600 barrels of oil equivalent per month. 13 months later that flow fell to just 8,000 boe per month. Related: U.S. Slaps Sanctions On Israeli Oil Billionaire

By 2016, Marathon came back and drilled more wells armed with new knowledge and drilling techniques. It drilled longer laterals and used much more frac fluid. Only four of the completions outperformed the older ones, and on average, the IP peaked at 32,500 boe per month (less than the older average) and declined to just 8,000 boe per month in seven months as opposed to the 13 months the first time around.

In other words, Marathon drilled more aggressively in 2016 and arguably came up with less impressive results.

This is not necessarily indicative of the entire shale industry by any means, but it does highlight some of the problems with relying too much on the initial production metric. Yes, IPs have climbed over time, but some of these wells are petering out faster than older wells.

In a way, this trend is understandable since it took place in an area that had already been drilled. But as U.S. shale basins mature, the industry will need to increasingly rely on similarly well-developed areas.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Sabtu, 30 Desember 2017

How Trump and the Nazis Stole Christmas To Promote White Nationalism - Newsweek

How Trump and the Nazis Stole Christmas To Promote White Nationalism - Newsweek

President Donald Trump wants Americans to think he reinvented Christmas.

“We can say ‘merry Christmas’ again,” he has said on numerous occasions, both during his campaign for president and his presidency. “Christmas is back, better and bigger than ever before,” he told supporters months before the Christmas season.

“You can say again ‘merry Christmas’ because Donald Trump is now the president,” said Corey Lewandowski, Trump’s former campaign manager, after Trump won the election.

Many of Trump’s Christian supporters argue that the president is ending the so-called war on Christmas, which has been presented by evangelicals and Fox news anchors as a threat to America’s Christian culture. Trump supporters say Americans have become too politically correct when they wish people happy holidays, a neutral term that can be used for people who celebrate Hanukkah, Eid al-Adha or any other religious holiday that takes place around the same time as Christmas.

883304450 Donald Trump has promised to bring back Christmas. Getty Images

But critics counter that Trump is promoting a version of the holidays that excludes members of other religions, and that his crusade to bring back Christmas is part of a larger attempt by the president to define America as a country for white Christians alone.

Wishing people “merry Christmas” instead of “happy holidays” is thus in line with Trump’s decision to ban citizens of Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States, critics say. It fits neatly with his refusal to condemn white supremacists when they march against diversity, and with his condemnation of athletes who protest police brutality against black men.

With this in mind, the fight to end the war on Christmas is exclusionary politics at its most flagrant.

“I see such invocations of Christmas as a kind of cypher, what some would call a dog whistle. It does not appear to be intolerant or extreme, but to attentive audiences it speaks volumes about identity and belonging—who and what are fully American,” Richard King, a professor at Washington State University who studies how white supremacists exploit culture, told Newsweek.

“Much like ‘Make America Great Again,’ panics over the protests by NFL players and the defense of Confederate memory, Christmas is a way to talk about peril, to assert a soft or hard version of white nationalism,” he said.

867654108 White nationalism and pro-Confederate sentiment has been a hot issue over the past year since Donald Trump took office. Getty Images

Trump isn’t the first political figure in history to co-opt Christmas. In fact, some see parallels between Trump’s speeches in front of Christmas trees and attempts by authoritarian regimes like the Nazis to manipulate popular celebrations to promote a political ideology. But by weaponizing Christmas in this way, Trump is bringing a dangerous tradition of politicizing religious holidays into the United States, one expert says.  

“Because Americans have enjoyed a relatively stable political system, Christmas in the U.S. has been relatively immune to the overt politicization of the holiday,” Joe Perry told Newsweek. He is the author of the book Christmas in Germany: A Cultural History, which examines the way Nazis used Christmas to spread fascism.

“But not completely immune. The far right’s engagement in the ‘war on Christmas’ explicitly posits that there is one single true or correct Christmas. The holiday’s true nature is somehow under threat from outsiders and liberals who act as forces of degradation, multiculturalism and secularization,” Perry continued.

In this context, Trump has been using the so-called war on Christmas to wage a culture war that pits multicultural liberals against Christian conservatives. He began doing this long before Christmas. Meanwhile, some members of the religious right support Trump’s most nationalist, race-baiting form of political rhetoric, including his reclaiming of Christmas.

94026245 Men dressed as Santa Claus and a tin soldier give a Nazi salute during a white supremacist event. Getty Images

Likewise, Nazi Germany’s propagandists rooted their idea of Christmas in visions of ethno-nationalism. They rewrote the lyrics of Christmas carols, promoted Nazified holiday traditions and launched numerous Christmas charity events for poor Germans. The ultimate goal was to draw a clear line between those who belonged and those who should be excluded and not benefit from the joys of Christmas.

Trump’s rhetoric differs from that of Nazi Germany’s, most notably because he has never advocated genocide. But Trump’s talk about Christmas coexists with re-emerging white identity politics, Randy Blazak, a sociology professor who studies white nationalism, told Newsweek.

“Committed white nationalists love Trump’s bring back Christmas campaign almost as much as evangelicals,” he said. “His followers see this as gospel and a rebuking of multiculturalism and political correctness, and the growing influence of Jews, Muslims, atheists and other non-WASPs.”

887096018 President Donald Trump, watched by Vice President Mike Pence, signs a proclamation in front of a Christmas tree. Getty Images

Perry said that Trump hasn’t gone nearly as far as the Nazis in promoting his vision of the holidays, and he sees major flaws in describing Trump as a Nazi-like figure. But there are some clear parallels.

“Trump and the Nazis share aspects of race baiting and perhaps broader aspects of extreme conservatism—many political ideologies do,” Perry said.

“Frankly, I’m not sure how far Trump himself is willing to go to use the holiday to promote anti-Muslim or anti-minority visions of America, or if he even really understands what he is doing with his ‘merry Christmas’ tirades.”



Bhopal gang-rape case: Court takes just 5 weeks to award life term to all 4 accused - International Business Times, India Edition

Bhopal gang-rape case: Court takes just 5 weeks to award life term to all 4 accused - International Business Times, India Edition
Juvenile held for rape every 4 hours in India

The fast-track court hearing the case of alleged gang-rape of an IAS aspirant truly lived up to its name when it took just five weeks to not only pronounce guilty judgement for all four accused but also send them to prison for the rest of their lives.

The incident dates back to October 31 this year, when the 19-year-old victim — both of whose parents are in the police — was raped by Golu Bihari, Amar alias Guntu, Rajesh alias Raju, and Ramesh Mehra for three hours in one of the busiest parts of Bhopal, the capital city of Madhya Pradesh. It had been reported that the men apparently took tea and tobacco breaks between raping the victim.

What exacerbated matters were when her parents approached a police station and the cops there refused to investigate the case, branding it a "filmy" story. It was only after the girl's parents nabbed two of the accused that a complaint was registered. A sub-inspector who refused to register a complaint was subsequently suspended.

Prison
[Representational image]Creative Commons

The punishment

Seventh additional district and sessions judge Savita Dubey put out a 55-page judgment in which she sentenced the accused to spend the rest of their natural lives in prison.

This is a strict punishment for rape, but Madhya Pradesh has already given its nod to a similarly strict bill, which even calls for the death penalty for rape convicts when their victims are less than 12 years of age.

The judge also fined the accused Rs 60,000. The amount is expected to be used to help in the rehabilitation of the victim.

Developments behind quick trial

One factor that may have led to a quick trial was that MP Chief minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan himself had ordered fast-tracking of the probe as public outrage over it peaked.

Haryana teen gang raped
[Representational Image]Creative commons

Chouhan was on Saturday, December 23, — the day the verdict was pronounced — quoted by the Times of India as saying: "In 55 days (since the crime), the investigation was completed, the chargesheet filed, and all four accused sentenced to life imprisonment. Strict and timely justice puts a check on criminal activities."

He added: "I feel relieved as justice is done in record time and criminals sentenced."

Another factor that could have led to this expeditious trial was the battery of cutting-edge tests that established the facts of the crime. For example, the diatom test confirmed that the water that went into the bodies of the accused was from the nullah besides which the victim was raped after she was waylaid from near the Habibganj railway station in Bhopal.



10 things you didn't know your Amazon Echo could do - USA TODAY

IPL 2018 auction: Ben Stokes to bring bidding war to the table as Englishman likely to get NOC - International Business Times, India Edition

IPL 2018 auction: Ben Stokes to bring bidding war to the table as Englishman likely to get NOC - International Business Times, India Edition
IPL media rights in numbers

England cricketer Ben Stokes has had some disciplinary problems of late, leading to his suspension from the national team ahead of the Ashes. The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) has a decision to make about Stokes' availability for the IPL 2018 auction, which is set to take place in Bengaluru on January 27-28.

Having already been given the green light by the ECB to play for Canterbury in New Zealand, Stokes should be given the go-ahead for the auction next month as well. 

"I imagine having given him an NOC (no-objection certificate) to play in New Zealand, it will be difficult for us to say on balance that we would not apply the same thinking to playing in other parts of the world," Cricbuzz quoted ECB Chief Executive Tom Harrison as saying.

Stokes was one of the most-sought-after all-rounders in the IPL 2017 auction, with teams like Mumbai Indians, Sunrisers Hyderabad and Delhi Daredevils bidding huge money, but the cricketer was finally sold to Rising Pune Supergiant for Rs 14.5 crore.

Ben Stokes, RPS, IPL 2017, playoffs, Qualifier 1
Ben Stokes will be up for grabs and teams will break their bank to get the all-rounder.IANS

RPS are no longer in the IPL as they had come in as one of the replacements for the suspended teams in the last two editions. With no RPS, the all-rounder will be in the auction pool, and could once again be in huge demand.

It would not be surprising if the player fetches more than Rs 14.5 crore this time after his heroics in his maiden season with RPS. Stokes scored 316 runs and took 12 wickets in IPL 2017, showcasing his worth as a genuine all-rounder in world cricket.

Such players generally bring bidding wars to the table, and this time it is not going to be any different as teams will look to sign him. But they may have to break the bank in order to sign Stokes. 



17 Major Spoilers in Star Wars: The Last Jedi - MovieWeb

17 Major Spoilers in Star Wars: The Last Jedi - MovieWeb
The time has finally arrived. After two years of impatiently waiting, Star Wars: The Last Jedi has finally arrived in theaters. Disney and Lucasfilm were surprisingly careful about not revealing too much about the movie in the marketing materials, even though this is a massive movie they want to promote and make sure tons of people see. After seeing it, and all of its many massive spoilers and big reveals, it's pretty clear why Disney and Lucasfilm were so careful.

Director Rian Johnson made sure to include a lot of big surprises for fans in The Last Jedi. It's now very easy to see why he was careful to warn fans about avoiding spoilers, and even some of the marketing materials, for the movie. There have been some big twists in the history of the franchise, but this movie may have some of the biggest ones to date. And that's saying something.

Warning: there are massive spoilers ahead for Star Wars: The Last Jedi. So if you haven't seen the movie yet, turn back now. In case you missed anything, or just need a little refresher, here are all of the biggest reveals and most shocking spoilers in Star Wars: The Last Jedi.

Leia uses the Force.

Leia uses the Force

Leia Organa and Luke Skywalker were separated at birth, but they both come from the same bloodline. Darth Vader's blood, Anakin Skywalker's blood, runs through their veins. So we've always known that Leia must have some Force sensitivity. Though, up until now, we've never really seen her use the Force on screen. That changes with Star Wars: The Last Jedi. In an early action sequence, Kylo Ren and some Tie Fighters attack the bridge of Leia's Resistance ship. Unfortunately, everyone on the bridge dies and is blasted into the cold vacuum of space. Or so it would seem. As it turns out, Leia manages to use the Force to save her own life and guide herself back to the ship. She's hurt, yes, but she manages to survive. Leia may not be a Jedi, but she can use the Force for real.

Rey and Kylo Ren have a Force connection.

Rey Kilo Ren

One of the biggest, developing relationships explored in Star Wars: The Last Jedi was between Rey and Kylo Ren. Though the duo spent very little time, until the third act of the movie, in the same place, they were working through their rather complex problems throughout the entire runtime. This was via a very strong Force connection the two were revealed to share. Such a strong Force connection has never been explored on screen, at least not in the way that it was explored in The Last Jedi. As we learn, this connection was facilitated by Snoke, which makes the whole thing even more interesting. It all has to do with director Rian Johnson doing a lot to expand the mythology of the Force in this latest movie.

Kylo Ren kill Supreme Leader Snoke.

Kylo kills Snoke

There's a lot to unpack with this particular reveal, but easily one of the most shocking moments in Star Wars: The Last Jedi is when Kylo Ren uses the Force to strategically position Rey/Luke's old lightsaber in order to kill Supreme Leader Snoke. This, after a redemption arc for Kylo Ren, aka Ben Solo, had been teased throughout the movie, via this connection with Rey. After Snoke dies, we see that Kylo Ren just wanted to assume power for himself and try to convert Rey to start a new order. Not the Jedi. Not the Sith. Something new entirely. That's crazy enough, but perhaps the most fascinating part is that Snoke is dead. That may seem obvious to say, but considering how much Snoke has been built up, the Supreme Leader is dead and we still know next to nothing about him.

Luke turned Ben Solo into Kylo Ren.

Luke Ben Solo

Ever since Star Wars: The Force Awakens, fans have wondered precisely what transpired in order to turn Ben Solo into the evil Kylo Ren. As revealed in Star Wars: The Last Jedi, it's shockingly explained that Luke Skywalker is actually responsible. During a flashback, we see that Luke senses a growing darkness in Ben Solo. At night, while he's sleeping, Luke goes to him and, in a fleeting moment of panic, he ignites his lightsaber and considers killing Ben Solo. In the midst of this, Ben Solo wakes up and catches Luke. This is the moment that turns Ben Solo into Kylo Ren. He buries Luke in rubble, kills several of his future Jedi and takes a handful of the students with him. While Luke wasn't actually going to go through with killing his nephew, this fleeting moment of doubt created the evil monster known as Kylo Ren.

R2-D2 replays Leia's Message to Obi-Wan.

Obi-Wan's message of Hope

During the beginning of Star Wars: The Last Jedi, Luke is very reluctant to train Rey and return to help the Resistance. While pondering what to do, he wanders onto the Millennium Falcon to take a trip down memory lane. He runs into his old buddy R2-D2, who tries to convince him that he must help Rey and the Resistance. In order to accomplish this goal, R2-D2 plays the message that Princess Leia made for Obi-Wan Kenobi in Star Wars: A New Hope. This serves as a touching moment and also helps convince Luke to help Rey. Also, since this is Carrie Fisher's last performance as Leia, it really plays into her legacy as the character.

Yoda appears as a Force ghost.

Yoda Force Ghost

For months, it had been speculated that Yoda was going to appear in Star Wars: The Last Jedi in some way or another. Many fans even looked at a rock on the island of Ahch-To in the teaser trailer that looked a little like Yoda and tired to make something of it. Ultimately, the Rock didn't turn out to be Yoda, but nonetheless, Yoda did appear as a Force ghost in The Last Jedi. At a crucial moment, when Luke is about to burn down the oldest relics of the Jedi order, Yoda appears to help guide his old pupil. Even though he's a Force ghost, this is most definitely the Yoda fans know and love. It's a puppet and that puppet is being played by the legendary Frank Oz. This is one of the most meaningful scenes in The Last Jedi and one that's enough to make any Star Wars fan well up with excitement. And possibly tears.



Review: Christopher Plummer Dominates 'All the Money in the World' - New York Times

Review: Christopher Plummer Dominates 'All the Money in the World' - New York Times
Photo
Christopher Plummer as J. Paul Getty in Ridley Scott’s “All the Money in the World” Credit Giles Keyte/Sony Pictures

“The quality of mercy is not strained,” Portia tells Shylock in “The Merchant of Venice.” It is “twice blest; it blesseth him that gives and him that takes.” The billionaire J. Paul Getty would probably have disagreed with Shakespeare’s take. A hoarder of women, art, antiquities — and most of all, money — Getty also might have taken issue with Portia’s claim that mercy “becomes the throned monarch better than his crown.” Portia delivers her mercy speech as she tries to persuade Shylock not to take a pound of flesh. She would have had an even tougher time with Getty.

“All the Money in the World” is a story of towering greed and the absence of mercy, and an ideal 21st century morality tale. It’s about money and families and the ties that bind and cut, although because it was directed by Ridley Scott there isn’t a jot of sentimentalism gumming the works. In July 1973, John Paul Getty III (known as Paul), the elder Getty’s 16-year-old grandson, was snatched off a street in Rome. His kidnappers demanded $17 million in ransom, telling Paul’s mother, “Get it from London.” It was a reference to Getty Sr., who in turn responded, “If I pay one penny now, I’ll have 14 kidnapped grandchildren,” a kiss-off heard around the world.

Mr. Scott sets the scene quickly with a somewhat phantasmagoric meander through Rome’s crowded streets. It’s night, and pretty, boyish Paul (Charlie Plummer) is savoring la dolce vita, floating past the city’s flesh and marble beauties and its swarms of catcalling, hustling paparazzi. There’s sensuousness to Paul’s drift, which, as the camera silkily slips alongside him, suggests a casual luxurious attitude toward life, of being free to do anything, go anywhere, say anything. He’s kissed by fortune but also by youth. And when a streetwalker calls him baby and he smiles, you see just how young. Within seconds he’s been kidnapped.

“All the Money in the World” revs up beautifully, first as a thriller. But while the kidnapping is the movie’s main event, it is only part of a story that is, by turns, a sordid, desperate and anguished tragedy about money. When Paul is kidnapped, Getty Sr. (Christopher Plummer) has already amassed a fortune, one partly pumped out of oil fields both in the United States and in the Middle East. (The Plummers are not related.) He lives alone in crepuscular gloom in Sutton Place, a manor house built by a favorite courtier of Henry VIII. There, amid miles of rooms adorned with gilt-framed masterworks, Getty Sr. closely monitors the stock information on the disgorging ticker tape that’s both his leash and lifeline.

Video

Trailer: ‘All the Money in the World’

A preview of the film.

By SONY PICTURES on Publish Date December 24, 2017. Image courtesy of Internet Video Archive. Watch in Times Video »

Mr. Scott is a virtuoso of obsession, of men and women possessed. He likes darkness, pictorially and of the soul, and in Getty Sr. he has a magnificent specimen. And in Mr. Plummer he has a great actor giving a performance with a singular asterisk: In early November, with the movie already done, Mr. Scott hired Mr. Plummer to replace Kevin Spacey, who has been accused of sexual misconduct. It was a bold move, an extreme variation on leaving a performance on the cutting-room floor. The 88-year-old Mr. Plummer isn’t fully persuasive when briefly playing the younger Getty Sr., even in long shot. But his performance is so dominating, so magnetic and monstrous that it doesn’t matter.

Like many contemporary movies, this one kinks up its timeline. After Paul is kidnapped, the scene shifts to Saudi Arabia in 1948, where Getty Sr. is laying the foundation for an even greater fortune. Written by David Scarpa — working from John Pearson’s 1995 book “Painfully Rich: The Outrageous Fortune and Misfortunes of the Heirs of J. Paul Getty” — the movie continues to jump around, filling in the back story while deepening the atmosphere and gathering the dramatis personae. One intimate scene takes place in the 1960s, where Paul’s mother, Gail (Michelle Williams, warmth incarnate), and father, Getty Jr. (Andrew Buchan), are going broke with four boisterous young children.

Continue reading the main story

India ODI squad for South Africa tour of 2018 announced; Big names miss out from 17-man list - International Business Times, India Edition

India ODI squad for South Africa tour of 2018 announced; Big names miss out from 17-man list - International Business Times, India Edition
Future gems of India cricket team

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) on Saturday (December 23) named a 17-member squad for the upcoming six-match ODI series against South Africa, starting February 1, 2018.

While discards Suresh Raina and Yuvraj Singh were once again not in consideration, the seasoned spin duo of R Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja continue to find themselves out of the limited-over squads. Notably, the two bowlers have not played for the Men in Blue since the tour to West Indies earlier this year.

The board's senior selection committee, which met here earlier in the day under chairman MSK Prasad left paceman Umesh Yadav out while recalling Mohammed Shami in the squad. The Bengal pacer last played an ODI against Australia in September 2017.

The squad also saw the return of Kedar Jadhav, who suffered a hamstring injury that kept him out of the limited-overs series against Sri Lanka.

Mumbai pacer Shardul Thakur also found a place in the squad after missing the limited-overs leg of the Sri Lanka series due to a shoulder injury.

The Virat Kohli-led squad includes as many as 10 frontline batsmen, including Hardik Pandya and Mahendra Singh Dhoni while the young wrist spin duo of Yuzvendra Chahal and Kuldeep Yadav were rewarded for their impressive ODI form.

Virat Kohli and Hardik Pandya
File photo of Hardik Pandya with captain Virat KohliJEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images

Asked about the continued absence of the experienced duo of Ashwin and Jadeja, Prasad said: "We have enough domestic matches. They have played enough cricket and have enough number of wickets under the belt," he said.

"(The) only issue is we have tried these guys (the young spinners) and time and again they are winning games for you, so it makes sense to continue with these guys for some time."

Left-arm spinner Axar Patel was also included in the squad which surprisingly left opener Lokesh Rahul, despite his back to back half-centuries in the first two T20 Internationals against Sri Lanka.

Complete squad

India: Virat Kohli (c), Rohit Sharma, Shikhar Dhawan, Ajinkya Rahane, Shreyas Iyer, Manish Pandey, Kedar Jadhav, Dinesh Karthik, MS Dhoni (wk), Hardik Pandya, Axar Patel, Kuldeep Yadav, Yuzvendra Chahal, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Shami, Shardul Thakur

Ahead of the ODIs, India will start their tour with the three-Test series against the Proteas, starting January 5 in Cape Town while the second (January 13-17) and third (January 24-28) Tests will be played in Centurion and Johannesburg, respectively.

The ODI series gets underway on February 1 in Durban, four days after the conclusion of the third Test. The second ODI will be played in Centurion on February 4, the third in Cape Town on February 7, while the fourth and fifth ODIs will be held on February 10 and 13 in Johannesburg and Port Elizabeth respectively.

The final ODI will be played in Centurion on February 16, followed by a three-match T20I series which concludes on February 24.



Jumat, 29 Desember 2017

The Little Town of Bethlehem Has a Surprising History - National Geographic

The Little Town of Bethlehem Has a Surprising History - National Geographic

Bethlehem has been the subject of countless carols and Nativity plays, but the real story of the little town is far more complex. Bethlehem had a long history even before it became known as the site of Jesus Christ’s birth. Now it sits at the heart of the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. [Find out whether there's historical evidence of the Apostles.]

With Christmas fast approaching, National Geographic reached out to Nicholas Blincoe, author of Bethlehem: Biography of a Town, to explore the legacy of the place where the famous manger lay. [Meet Santa's naughty counterpart.]

View Images

The book opens with you arriving in Bethlehem carrying a Christmas pudding. Explain why it captures “something of the essence of Bethlehem”—and how an Englishman ended up on the West Bank.

I met my wife, Leila Sansour, at university in Britain where we were both studying philosophy. She’s a Palestinian from Bethlehem. Her mother’s Russian, her father is Palestinian and was one of a group of academics that founded Bethlehem University.

I knew nothing about Bethlehem or Palestine or the politics, but I was in love with Leila and we were going to get married, so I went to Bethlehem to meet her family. I was determined to bring something of England, thinking of Christmas and Charles Dickens. So I came carrying a Christmas pudding from Harrods.

Leila’s father was looking at the ingredients and realized everything in the pudding was growing in his garden that Christmas. The lemons were in fruit; there were oranges, figs, and almonds. And everything that doesn’t grow there, I learned, had been carried through the desert in ancient times by desert traders on the spice route. This quintessentially British dish turned out to be absolutely Middle Eastern!

Bethlehem is, of course, famous as the birthplace of Jesus. Does the historical and archaeological record confirm this?

It is impossible to say that the archaeology confirms Christ was born there. But there’s lots of evidence in its favor. According to the Bible, Mary and Joseph either came to Bethlehem for a census, or they already lived there. It’s difficult to say which of these, or either, is true.

Pilgrims visiting Bethlehem within about 100 years of Christ’s birth already believed Christ was born there. We also have these very specific descriptions of what the town was like at the time.

When pilgrims visited later, after Rome had become Christian, people did describe a manger. But it sounds more likely to have been a trough than a manger. This was on display at one point, and it fits the picture of a town where the water supply is the most important thing.

When Was the Tomb of Christ Discovered? Where is the tomb of Jesus Christ? Is the site worshipped today the same one that was discovered during the time of Constantine? Find out how scientists used archaeology and other dating methods to solve one of history's greatest mysteries.

Though less famous, it is also the location for another momentous cultural event: the first artistic portrayal of two humans making love. Tell us about the Ain Sakhri lovers—and the work of biblical historian, Karen Armstrong.

Bethlehem is very close to the Dead Sea. There’s a route up from the Dead Sea in an area called Ain Sakhri, and in caves there, in the 1930s, some Bedouin shepherd boys found a small stone carving. It became evident that it was two people having sex. Archaeologists dated it to the Stone Age—11,000 years ago—and it’s the earliest depiction we have of people making love.

Karen Armstrong has a theory of world history before history gets written, where nomads track across the desert eventually establishing towns as they go, creating little pockets of their civilization and telling stories about themselves. The people who created this sculpture, the Natufians as they’re now called, are an example of this. They were nomads who found that if they stayed in one spot, they could have everything they needed. In the springtime, when the lambs are born, there’s grass for about two weeks, so they can feed their sheep. In the hills they can grow almonds, which were the first trees to be cultivated. Then, olive trees. This lifestyle gave them enough free time to sit down and start thinking about sex—and carving some sculptures.

Though it is perched on a hilltop, water has played a key role in Bethlehem’s history, hasn’t it?

Bethlehem is a collection of very fertile villages that grows almonds and, more importantly, olives for oil. It’s so fertile because Bethlehem sits on an enormous aquifer, which eventually became the water source for Jerusalem in around 200 BCE. There were so many Jewish pilgrims coming to Jerusalem that the city couldn’t cope. The older water supply was contaminated by the animals slaughtered in the temple. They needed fresh water and this came from Bethlehem.

Bethlehem was built specifically to sit on top of the aquifer and be the defensive military installation guarding the whole infrastructure. It’s a fortress town amongst a series of villages, which is why the Bible always talks about the best tasting water coming from Bethlehem.

That’s what Bethlehem is: a place that guards the water. About 2,300 years ago, they built a reservoir. Over the course of history another three gigantic reservoirs were built just to the south of Bethlehem, which became known as Solomon’s Pools. They’re still there.

View Images

The British artist Banksy opened the Walled Off hotel in Bethlehem next to the wall that encloses much of the town.


I was fascinated to discover that Bethlehem was made famous as a site of Christian pilgrimage, not by churchmen, but by a succession of Roman women. Tell us about St. Helena—and her architectural legacy.

St. Helena was the Emperor Constantine’s mother. In her late teens, she was a barmaid somewhere near Isthmia or Smyrna. She married a very ambitious Roman general, who had divorced his first wife, and they had a son, who became the emperor Constantine. At a great age, his mother became the most powerful woman in the empire and a very influential Christian.

Christianity seemed to appeal to wealthy Roman women because many of them had built up large inherited fortunes, either through divorce or death. But there wasn’t any way to use that power in Roman political society. Christianity became a roundabout way in which they could have influence.

St. Helena was one of these women, and the most powerful of them. She made a huge pilgrimage, building churches as she traveled through Europe, what’s now Turkey and the Middle East, until she arrives in Jerusalem and Bethlehem.

The church she built in Bethlehem is unlike any other. She picked the spot because the Roman bishop of Caesarea took her there, and the locals pointed out the spot that had, for the previous 200 years, been where pilgrims had celebrated. She saw this little cave and this ceramic manger or trough where people worshipped Christ. She wasn’t inventing the mythology. She was celebrating a site that already existed.

The church she built is unlike any other. She basically burrowed into the cave, opened up the top of it, put a roof on and built a rotunda with a balcony, so you could look down into the cave. It was St. Helena who created the famous little town of Bethlehem. She put the place on the map as the center of pilgrimage. She was followed by other very wealthy Roman women, the most prominent among them being St. Paula.

Sadly, the church she built doesn’t exist anymore. The Samaritans burnt it down in a revolt. Two churches following the same design also no longer exist. But the cave does, though it’s changed.

Bethlehem is today a hostage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. You had a frontline view when you worked with paramedics in Bethlehem during the intifada. Tell us about that experience—and how it shaped your view of the conflict.

In late 2001, the violence between Israel and Palestine escalated. In the course of it, the Israelis fired a missile at the building opposite my wife’s house. My mother-in-law, who was by then a widow, was living there. And the building opposite her house was blown up and the roof ripped off our house. We were panicky about how she was coping, so we went there at the earliest opportunity and began living in Leila’s home in Bethlehem in 2002.

Things got worse and worse. On the Monday after Easter Sunday 2002, the Israelis invaded, under Ariel Sharon, and occupied all of the cities of the West Bank, including Bethlehem. We were in the house as helicopters flew overhead, all very scared. The Israeli army eventually moved into the old souk area and surrounded the Church of the Nativity.

I was working with paramedics. There was an idea that ambulances would be able to drive around in the curfew if there were Europeans with them. By that point I felt very Palestinian. There was an attempt by militants to meet Israeli violence with violence but Palestinian cities got wiped out. For ten years after the second intifada, in 2001, tourism to Bethlehem struggled, although today the number of visitors has increased again. To live through that, you feel you are living as one of the defeated.

The reclusive street artist Banksy recently opened a venue in Bethlehem called the Walled Off Hotel. What’s that all about?

The reason Israel has been so interested in Bethlehem is the same reason everyone’s always been interested in it; it’s still one of the main sources of water for Jerusalem. In 1967, the Israelis established a pumping station at Kfar Etzion in the Bethlehem governorate, which later became the site of a settlement. Now there are 22 surrounding the town. Between the settlements and Bethlehem there is a settler ring road; and between that and Bethlehem there’s a wall. It is an open-air prison. There’s no other way to describe it.

Banksy arrived in about 2006. We were there over Christmas, and people started saying that an English graffiti artist was here. I’d heard of Banksy but discounted it. Then I realized there were Banksy paintings springing up all over town. He’s maintained his interest in Bethlehem ever since, which culminated in him creating what he’s called the Walled Off Hotel (a pun on the famous Waldorf Hotel) not far from the check point into Bethlehem, in a house that’s about 12 feet from the wall where it circles Rachel’s Tomb.

There’s mixed feelings in Bethlehem about it. People wonder if he’s making money out of it or self-publicizing it. Other people feel that he’s drawing attention to the wall. Overall, there’s a sense that Banksy’s done something funny. Palestinians have a great sense of humor.

You suggest Bethlehem may need another “miracle” if it is to survive. Explain what you mean—and how you see the future for Bethlehem.

Throughout its history, surprising things have happened. It’s not just the place where Christ was born, it’s the place where the earliest sculpture of people making love was created, and where the Dead Sea scrolls were discovered. In the early 20th century it became a home to Armenians and Syriacs fleeing from the holocaust that came with the birth of the Turkish state. In 1948, it became home to Palestinians fleeing the creation of the Israeli state.

It’s always been a town that’s welcomed not only pilgrims and traders but refugees. Each wave has changed the town dramatically but the town itself has survived. Today, there are equal numbers of Israelis and Palestinians, and the Palestinians are never going to go away.

This interview was edited for length and clarity.

Clarification: This interview has been updated to more accurately reflect the source of some of Jerusalem’s water, and levels of tourism in Bethlehem in the years following 2001.

Simon Worrall curates Book Talk. Follow him on Twitter or at simonworrallauthor.com.

Bethlehem by Nicholas Blincoe is published by Constable.



Kamis, 28 Desember 2017

An infamous Mercedes-Benz used by Adolf Hitler to be auctioned in Arizona - Fox News

An infamous Mercedes-Benz used by Adolf Hitler to be auctioned in Arizona - Fox News

A Mercedes-Benz that was used to shuttle Adolf Hitler around Nazi Germany will be auctioned in Arizona early next year and could be worth millions, if anyone steps up to bid on it.

The 1939 Mercedes-Benz 770K Grosser Offener Tourenwagen’s anonymous owner will offer the car to bidders at the Worldwide Auctioneers event in Scottsdale on Jan. 17, during the city’s annual classic car extravaganza.

While any Nazi symbols on the vehicle were removed long ago, the ghosts of its past remain.

(Original Caption) Storm Troopers, with arms linked, hold back the crowds, as the leader of the Reich, Adolf Hitler, returns to Berlin after the triumph of his Armies in France. He returned on July 6th, 1940, after having visited conquered Paris. The street is strewn with flowers. Hitler stands upright in his official car and returns the salutes of his greeters.

Adolf Hitler in Berlin on July 6, 1940  (Getty Images)

The imposing, four-door convertible “Super Mercedes” is one of a handful of cars used by the German High Command that have a well-documented connection to Hitler himself, including parading him through Berlin after the defeat of France in 1940 and after the invasion of Yugoslavia and Greece in 1941. Benito Mussolini also got a ride in it during a visit to Germany.

The partially-armored car eventually fell out of this use and turned up in France, where it was captured after the war by American forces who, no doubt unaware of its notoriety, assigned it to a military police motor pool for several months.

hitler

In 1946, the car found its way into private hands in Belgium, and three years after that, an American tobacco merchant purchased it and donated it to the Greenville, N.C., branch of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. Ironically, like many other vehicular trophies from the war, it was rolled out for patriotic parades, according to Robert Klara, author of “The Devil's Mercedes: The Bizarre and Disturbing Adventures of Hitler's Limousine in America,” which chronicles the controversial legacy of this car and others from the Fuehrer’s fleet.

The car later sat for years in a garage and had been nearly forgotten in 1976 when collectors Steve Munson and Joe Ogden purchased it for $50,000. When they discovered its possible ties to Hitler, they spent another $50,000 to restore it.

hitler

Munson and Ogden publicized the car and displayed it in several venues before it was sold twice more for unknown amounts. (One of the sales was rumored to be on the order of $1 million). In 1983, it found a home at the Imperial Palace Collection in Las Vegas, an enormous car museum owned by Ralph Engelstad, a casino operator. Engelstad had a private room full of Nazi relics in which he held Hitler-themed birthday parties that got him slapped with a $1.5 million fine from Nevada gaming authorities.

After Engelstad died in 2002, the car and several other Mercedes from the collection were sold to a European collector. It was sold again in 2009 to an anonymous buyer known only to be a wealthy Russian businessman, who displayed it briefly in a Moscow car museum to celebrate the Russian-led Soviet Union’s role in defeating the Nazis.

hitler

Michael Fröhlich, the German car dealer who brokered the sale, would not confirm how much the Russian businessman paid for the car, citing confidentiality stipulations. But to the best of his knowledge, he said, it hasn’t been sold since.

Now it likely will be — and in the same city where what turned out to be a phony Hitler-linked Mercedes was sold amid protests and bomb threats for a then-record $153,000 in 1973.

Ken Jacobson, deputy national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said the organization isn’t so much concerned about next month’s auction itself as it is about what will happen to the car afterward.

MORE CLASSIC CAR NEWS FROM FOX NEWS AUTOS

“We understand there is a market for war memorabilia and that serious collectors are interested in items like this,” Jacobson told Fox News. “While we don’t have an issue with Nazi-era automobiles like this going up for auction, we would not want to see the vehicle winding up in the hands of someone who would use it to glorify Hitler or the deeds of the Nazis. Ideally, we would prefer to see it housed in a museum, so that it could be understood in its proper context.”

Klara agrees. He said the car is a legitimate World War II timepiece, but it’s also a “socially radioactive one that needs to be handled in a historically responsible way, because there isn’t anyone who doesn’t have an opinion on a car like this….

“The onus is on the owner to present it in a correct, culturally sensitive context. That’s the job of a museum, but a tougher task for a private collector.”

Just how much the car will sell for remains to be seen. One of America’s most prominent classic car valuation experts, who asked to remain anonymous, said a Mercedes-Benz like this is likely worth $5 million to $7 million, but this one, given its historical significance, could sell for double that.

Whatever it goes for, the auction house said the seller has promised to donate 10 percent of the proceeds to an unidentified organization dedicated to Holocaust education.

Gary Gastelu is FoxNews.com's Automotive Editor. Follow him on Twitter @garygastelu



“I Have Power”: Is Steve Bannon Running for President? - Vanity Fair

A Better Kind of Nursing Home - New York Times

A Better Kind of Nursing Home - New York Times

At conventional nursing homes, aides have to hustle residents out of bed, help them dress, escort them to the dining room by whatever time breakfast is served, and then perhaps whisk them off for physical therapy. These facilities struggle to provide even a smidgen of personal autonomy.

Here, physical therapists come to the Green House Homes. If they find a resident still asleep, they come back later.

The Green House Project, which in 2003 opened its first small nursing homes in Tupelo, Miss., counts just 242 licensed homes in 32 states to date, with 150 more in various stages of planning or construction. (Next up: Bartlett, Tenn.; Lima, Ohio; and Little Rock, Ark.) That’s a droplet in the bucket of the nation’s more than 15,000 nursing homes.

But few aspects of aging generate quite so much anticipatory horror as nursing homes, and so Green Houses have attracted disproportionate attention, including media coverage.

Photo
Staff, friends and family sang holiday carols to Green House residents on a recent evening. Credit Bryan Anselm for The New York Times

They seem to embody change. “The numbers are still modest, but it truly is a different model of care,” said Sheryl Zimmerman, a gerontologist and health services researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

What wasn’t clear, until Dr. Zimmerman and a team of researchers around the country undertook the most comprehensive research to date on Green Houses, was how good a job these newcomers do. “Does this model work?” she asked. “Is it sustainable and replicable?”

The group’s study of nearly 100 Green Houses compared to standard nursing homes, funded by a $2 million grant from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and published in the journal Health Services Research, showed that Green Houses don’t fulfill all their goals and promises.

Though “control over the rhythms of the day” represents a pillar of Green House life, as one of its brochures declares, the researchers found that about a third of the homes didn’t allow residents to decide when they awakened, and most restricted when residents could bathe or shower. Compared to conventional nursing homes, Green Houses also are far less likely to offer formal activities.

But overall, the studies, incorporating nine years of data, add up to a positive report card. “Compared to traditional nursing homes, no doubt about it,” said Dr. Zimmerman. “It’s a preferable model of care.”

Among the reasons:

* Green Houses practice what’s called “consistent assignment,” meaning that the same aides care for the same few residents. “People know you. They know your likes and dislikes,” Dr. Zimmerman said. “There’s more trust and familiarity. Relationships develop.”

An aide (in Green House lingo, a shahbaz) who knows residents well is also better able to spot health problems early on. “Because aides were in closer and more consistent contact, they were more aware of changes in residents’ conditions,” Dr. Zimmerman said.

A Green House shahbaz spends many more hours on patient care: an average 4.2 hours per resident per day, compared with 2.2 hours in conventional nursing homes. (At Green Houses, that includes tasks like preparing meals and doing laundry.)

* Compared to residents in traditional nursing homes, Green House residents fared better on three of eight federal inspection criteria, and did equally well on the others.

The researchers found that Green House residents were 16 percent less likely to be bedridden, 38 percent less likely to have pressure ulcers and 45 percent less likely to have catheters. Avoidable hospitalizations and readmissions were also lower, reassuring observers who wondered if the Green Houses’ emphasis on quality of life meant sacrificing quality of care.

Photo
A communal living room at a Green House, decorated for the holidays. A new study finds that the Green House model compares favorably to conventional nursing homes. Credit Bryan Anselm for The New York Times

* Though Green Houses are expensive to build (including a $200,000 payment to the nonprofit Green House Project for training, design and support), with 8 percent higher operating costs than standard nursing homes, they save Medicare 30 percent per resident per year. (They charge residents or their insurers somewhat more than regular nursing homes, however.)

Developers also seem able to adapt them for particular populations. They’ve built Green Houses for assisted living, for veterans, for a public housing agency, for people with dementia and multiple sclerosis.

Green Houses incorporate hospice care, too. “We try very hard to say, ‘This is home for life,’” said Susan Ryan, senior director of the Green House Project.

She’s troubled by how slowly the model has spread, partly because of complex state regulations and financial obstacles.

Critics who deplore the state of American nursing homes have called for a “culture change” for at least 20 years. That means “deinstitutionalizing nursing homes, making them more like the way we’ve lived all our lives, with our own routines and familiar objects,” said Robyn Grant, public policy director for The National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care.

We’ve made only modest progress toward that goal, Ms. Grant said. Perhaps one function of the Green House model, then, is to point the way.

“There are many elements of it that could be done by other nursing homes,” Ms. Grant said. “There are ways to break down the size and make nursing homes smaller,” with workers consistently assigned to a group of residents. Facilities could be redesigned to offer private rooms; they could give residents more say over their routines.

At Green Hill (disclosure: my late father lived there for a year and a half, though not in a Green House), Dorothy Bagli’s family has discussed whether to move her into the facility’s traditional nursing home, which costs slightly less.

But Jeanne Jenusaitis, one of her 12 children, thinks the small scale of the Green House suits her mother, along with aides who know and understand her. Wouldn’t her mother, who has dementia, get disoriented trying to find her way through the long nursing home corridors? Would there be a staff person always in sight to assuage her fears?

Her Green House, Ms. Jenusaitis said, “is so much more nonclinical. She likes that feeling of home.”

Continue reading the main story

The Greatest Showman: The True Story of PT Barnum and Jenny Lind - Vanity Fair

The Greatest Showman: The True Story of PT Barnum and Jenny Lind - Vanity Fair

Left, P.T. Barnum; right, Hugh Jackman in The Greatest Showman.

Left, from Hulton Archive/Getty Images; Right, by Niko Tavernise.

On September 1, 1850, 30,000 onlookers packed the waterfront around Canal Street in New York City, clamoring to catch a glimpse of the Swedish opera singer Jenny Lind as she disembarked from the steamship Atlantic to begin an American tour. Lind’s American promoter, the visionary entertainer and entrepreneur P.T. Barnum, greeted the singer with a bouquet and waved her into a private carriage as police pushed the teeming crowds apart, Hard Day’s Night-style.

The Jenny Lind tour was a barnstormer, taking in the modern equivalent of $21 million over a nine-month engagement and spawning an American mania for all things Lind: concert tickets, women’s hats, opera glasses, paper dolls, sheet music, even Lind-branded chewing tobacco. (The craze persists in today's children’s furnture stores, where you can still purchase a spindled “Jenny Lind crib.”)

But more than Lind’s fame or Barnum’s marketing success, the story that has persisted most through the decades is the did-they-or-didn’t-they frisson of a suspected romance between the entertainer and his star attraction. Certainly the new Hugh Jackman film The Greatest Showman, a highly fictionalized musical biopic starring Rebecca Ferguson as Lind, subscribes to the idea of an infatuation between the showman and the singer. Nor is this the first such suggestion: fictionalized versions of Barnum’s life, including the eponymous 1980 Broadway musical, have often relied on the tension of a man torn between his steady, Puritan wife and an exotic European songstress. The love triangle is, however attractive, a fiction.

So how did Jenny Lind become part of P.T. Barnum’s world, and why wasn’t romance a factor?

Left, by Niko Tavernise; Right, from Bettmann Collection.

From unassuming origins, Jenny Lind became the darling of European opera. Born out of wedlock and into a dismal childhood, she was admitted to the Royal Theatre in Stockholm as a voice student at the age of nine, and by her tween years was a renowned professional singer. Lind’s angelic voice and devotion to philanthropy charmed anyone with ears to hear, and when she retired from the opera circuit in 1849 at the age of 28, her final performance was attended by no less than Queen Victoria.

P.T. Barnum, then riding high on the fame of his American Museum in New York City, longed to elevate his public profile—which, while profitable, mainly associated him with dime-museum fare. In a bid for respectability, he lured Lind from retirement to tour America, promising an unprecedented $1,000 per night for up to 150 nights of performances—with expenses and musical assistants of Lind’s choice included. Not only that, Barnum offered to put salaries on deposit up-front, which required him to either sell or mortgage everything he owned.

It was a huge bet, without a safety net. But to Barnum, the chance to establish himself as an American tastemaker was worth the risk.

And a risk it was: despite her considerable European fame, Barnum had never heard Lind sing a note, and most Americans had no idea that the “Swedish Nightingale” was not, in fact, a bird. Barnum had six months to get Lind’s name out to the American public and create demand.

The public-relations blitz, which included constant newspaper coverage, a song contest, and competitive ticket auctions, worked a treat: from her first show on September 11, 1850, at the Castle Garden in New York, Jenny Lind was a sensation. The New York Tribune plainly summarized the collective rapture, writing: “Jenny Lind’s first concert is over; and all doubts are at an end. She is the greatest singer we have ever heard.”

Her Greatest Showman portrayal notwithstanding, Lind was not the red-lipstick type. The singer favored simple white dresses, didn’t subscribe to the fashion for tight corseting, and rarely did more with her mousy brown hair than tie it in a gentle braided up-do. She made grown men cry solely through the purity of her voice, and impressed Americans particularly with her lack of pretension, donating thousands of dollars to local charities along her tour itinerary. (The New York Fire Department was so enchanted with Lind and her generous bequests that they presented her with a gold box with the department insignia as a token.) Crowds loved that Jenny Lind did not seem to be performing a fiction so much as telegraphing herself, truly, in all her innocence and grace.

And while this arrangement was good for their respective bank accounts, neither Lind nor Barnum was interested in mixing business with pleasure.

Lind was the first to admit that she was not renowned as a great beauty—she would, matter-of-factly, tell people that she had a “potato nose”—and was generally impervious to gentlemen’s advances. She kept even suitors like Frederic Chopin and Hans Christian Andersen firmly at arm’s length while she focused on music and charity work, hoping to achieve her goal of establishing a girls’ music academy in Stockholm. (Andersen, stung by rejection, pined for Lind in his story The Nightingale, in which a grand emperor is enthralled with a jeweled automaton in the shape of a bird—but can only be saved from death by the singing of a plain brown nightingale.)

And if Barnum’s story about Jenny Lind visiting his home in Bridgeport, Connecticut, is any indication, she was not inclined to find the entertainer and his coarse Yankee wit even halfway amusing. At his mansion, Iranistan, Barnum kept a pet cow who liked to graze below his office window. A house staffer typically kept Bessie’s grass free of pedestrian traffic; not knowing who Lind was, he shooed her off the lawn. Shocked at the rough instructions, Lind sniffed: “Do you know who I am?” The gardener flatly replied, “No, but I do know you ain’t P.T. Barnum’s cow.”

The interaction did not improve from there. Barnum, hearing the ruckus, leaned from his window and from his vantage point could see the agitated cow but not Lind. “Does she want to be milked?” he asked. Thoroughly steamed, Lind stepped into view and roared at the suddenly mortified showman: “I don’t want to be milked, but I do want to go back to England—and today, too!”

Where Lind would have found a relationship untoward, Barnum would simply have considered it a distraction. Intently focused on his many entrepreneurial ventures, Barnum thrived on ego and constant public activity. He trusted his wife, Charity, to run house and home, propping her up from a distance with assuring letters and the fruits of his fame. Far from the breezy, contented spouse portrayed by Michelle Williams in the film, Charity Barnum was more beleaguered than buoyant; understandable, given she was married to a perpetual motion machine for 44 years and raised three girls largely on her own, all while dealing with indeterminate chronic illness and the untimely death of the Barnums’ fourth daughter.

Road life wore on the ensemble, and after nine solid months of performances, Lind invoked a contractual right to end the tour early. She later attempted to tour again, though her popularity was by then diminished; without Barnum by her side to suck up even the suggestion of negative press, Lind’s evident fatigue—and her 1852 marriage to accompanist Otto Goldschmidt—sat poorly with the public.

Goldschmidt was in many ways an unattractive match from a 19th-century public relations perspective; he was significantly younger than Lind, Jewish, and his name had an unpleasantly Teutonic bite to American audiences, who preferred Lind both lilting and single. But he offered Lind something neither stage nor showman could: emotional stability. Lind admired Goldschmidt as a pianist, found him not only secure but creatively inspiring at a time when she was worn out from touring, and, most of all, finally found in him the consistency and comfort she so earnestly craved.

“We are put together of precisely the same stuff,” she wrote with evident satisfaction, “and one of us only needs to begin a sentence before the other know the end of it.” The couple remained happily married until Lind’s death in 1887.

Get Vanity Fair’s HWD Newsletter

Sign up for essential industry and award news from Hollywood.

Full ScreenPhotos: 9 Movie Star Wrap Gifts these Celebrities Will Never Forget
Adam Sandler

Adam Sandler

Back in 2010, Adam Sandler was so grateful that his dad comedy Grown Ups became a box-office success that he gifted his co-stars Chris Rock, David Spade, Rob Schneider, and Kevin James with $200,000 Maseratis.

Photo: From Columbia Pictures/Everett Collection.
Chris Rock

Chris Rock

Sometimes a wrap gift can be extended for a special work occasion, like the time Chris Rock tapped Tina Fey and Louis C.K. to help him rewrite a movie. After they were done, he sent them both custom Rolex watches with a special message engraved: “Thanks, motherfucker.”

Photo: By E. Charbonneau/WireImage.
Gavin Hood

Gavin Hood

While making X-Men: Origins, Hugh Jackman went fully nude for one of Wolverine’s escape scenes. The most revealing shots were carefully cut out of the film. But at wrap time, director Gavin Hood presented Jackman with something special: “a bag which had all the film cut off with my dick in it,” Jackman revealed in an interview. “I got frames of film, and I am looking, going, ‘O.K., hello!’ ”
Photo: From 20th Century Fox/Everett Collection.
Oprah

Oprah

Oprah is probably the most iconic gift-giver of her generation. She lived up to her expectation while on set for Ava DuVernay’s A Wrinkle in Time, giving the whole cast and crew—which included stars like Mindy Kaling and Reese Witherspoon—$400 Juicero juicers.

Photo: By Michael Kovac/Getty Images.
Joe Swanberg

Joe Swanberg

If you’re making a movie about booze, the wrap gift might as well fit the theme. In 2013, director Joe Swanberg gifted the cast and crew of Drinking Buddies beer he brewed at home with stars Olivia Wilde and Jake Johnson.

Photo: From Magnolia Pictures/Everett Collection.
Steven Spielberg

Steven Spielberg

Director Steven Spielberg adored the cast of his romantic drama Always so much that once the movie wrapped, he gave them all (including Richard Dreyfuss, Holly Hunter, and John Goodman) fresh Mazda Miatas.

Photo: From United Artists/Everett Collection.
Nora Ephron

Nora Ephron

While remembering the late Nora Ephron in an essay for Time, Tom Hanks revealed a charming little fact about the famous director of films like Sleepless in Seattle. She loved giving trees as wrap gifts, particularly fruit trees. “Rita [Wilson] and I chose orange,” Hanks wrote. “And the fruit has been lovely, sweet and abundant, just as Nora promised—a constant and perfect reminder of the woman we loved so much.”
Photo: From Warner Bros/Everett Collection.